Acc championship game tv ratings

Michigan-Loyola IL 7. Villanova-Kansas 6. UNC-Gonzaga UNC-Oregon Gonzaga-South Carolina 8. Villanova-UNC UNC-Syracuse 7. Villanova-Oklahoma 6. Duke-Wisconsin Wisconsin-Kentucky Duke-Michigan State 8. UConn-Kentucky Kentucky-Wisconsin 9. UConn-Florida 6. Louisville-Michigan Syracuse-Michigan Louisville-Wichita State 8. Kentucky-Kansas Kansas-Ohio State 9. Kentucky-Louisville 8. UConn-Butler UConn-Kentucky 9.

Butler-VCU 8. Duke-Butler Duke-West Virginia 9. Butler-Michigan State 8. UNC-Michigan State UNC-Villanova 8. Michigan State-UConn 7. Kansas-Memphis Kansas-UNC 8. Memphis-UCLA 7. Florida-Ohio State Florida-UCLA 8. I think that is what makes this a snooze fest of a NC. My point is that the playoffs were supposedly going to solve the issue of identifying a true undisputed champion.

This situation obviously did not accomplish that. You either only play someone once in your season, or you have a multi-series. Just playing twice and having different outcomes proves absolutely nothing. The ratings are alarming?

To who? Not by TV ratings. I checked the highest rated shows by viewers in Only 2 shows in the entire year other than NFL games had more people watching than did the game Monday night. And 1 of those followed the Super Bowl. Ratings were up over last year so advertisers got the viewers they paid for.

So overall, not alarming. The fight was on. After awhile, they decided to calm down and eat an apple. It was all downhill from there. We do not target any individuals under the age of We support responsible gambling. Keith Farner 2 days ago. Stetson Bennett writes the final chapter of the best storybook tale in Georgia football history. It's the SEC's world. The rest of college football is just losing in it. Alabama exodus: 5 Crimson Tide players, including key TE and pass rusher, reportedly enter transfer portal.

That is not a joke. I'm surprised it was Dec 8, , AM. Anyone else? Re: Championship game TV ratings Shocked that Wake Pitt didn't move the needle. It could've been put on C-Span. Thanks Swofford. Your legacy lives on. Re: Thanks Swofford. That is immaterial and dumb. Neither Swofford nor anyone else in the ACC had anything to do with the time or teams.

He did have something to do with the stength of the Dec 8, , AM. Swoffy pursued and favored a basketball conference agenda, a revenue share plan, and handshake tv deals with his friends at Raycom who btw hired his son as college basketball died. The tv ratings are a direct reflection of his moronic approach. Way to carry on the Swofford legacy. I'm here for it. Some people just don't get it.

I get it, but it was actually one of the better games [2] Dec 7, , PM. But Wake is a basketball school and Pitt is, well, baby brother to an NFL team, so yeah, for the most part - who cares.

Without doing any research, I'd guess that over the past 10 [1] Dec 7, , PM. Dec 8, , AM. Not surprising because of the games listed to Pitt-Wake was the least important nationally. No Playoff drama for the ACC game. Tell 'em u7c coot. No one knows losing better than you.

I'd think the ratings would've been similar to the PAC game had the timeslots for the 2 games been swapped. All we had to do was score more than 14 in regulation against NC ST! That said, it was actually one of the better conference championship games.